On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:22:33 Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:55:26PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:51:19 +0100
From: Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com
Subject: Re: Bug#513382: akonadi-server: depends on mysql-server
To:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:22:33 Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:55:26PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:51:19 +0100
From: Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com
Subject: Re: Bug#513382:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:19:53AM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:22:33 Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:55:26PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:51:19 +0100
From: Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com
Subject: Re:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 09:26:59 Roger Leigh wrote:
you would prefer if they used oracle or postgresql?
I really think using mysql is much better than reimplementing a fast
storage that allows concurrent access.
Depending on /any/ database *server* is not acceptable. It should
be using
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:19:53AM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
you would prefer if they used oracle or postgresql?
I really think using mysql is much better than reimplementing a fast
storage that allows concurrent access.
Depending on /any/
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 02:55:26PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:51:19 +0100
From: Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com
Subject: Re: Bug#513382: akonadi-server: depends on mysql-server
To: 513382-d...@bugs.debian.org
No. this is how akonadi at least
6 matches
Mail list logo
