Bug#515214: I don't think we need to add complexity to X on Debian

2009-04-21 Thread Pascal Mainini
Hi all knowing that the BTS is *not* a voting system and with deep respect about the work done in Debian and also in the X-system, i still feel the need to raise my voice. As a long term Debian user, running multiple servers and enduser systems across multiple releases i feel a bit scared about t

Bug#515214: I don't think we need to add complexity to X on Debian

2009-04-15 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Mon Apr 13 10:41, Robert Grimm wrote: > On Sun, 12 April 2009, you wrote: > > Please do not accept any of the patches. Most users want things to just > > work. Anyone who wants to keep their systems hal-free is capable of > > configuring xorg accordingly and should be able to make a filler packa

Bug#515214: I don't think we need to add complexity to X on Debian

2009-04-13 Thread Robert Grimm
On Sun, 12 April 2009, you wrote: > Please do not accept any of the patches. Most users want things to just > work. Anyone who wants to keep their systems hal-free is capable of > configuring xorg accordingly and should be able to make a filler package > using equivs to fulfill the dependency with

Bug#515214: I don't think we need to add complexity to X on Debian

2009-04-12 Thread Gustavo Noronha
Please do not accept any of the patches. Most users want things to just work. Anyone who wants to keep their systems hal-free is capable of configuring xorg accordingly and should be able to make a filler package using equivs to fulfill the dependency with no need to increase the complexity for the