tags #516285 help
thanks
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 09:54:36PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote:
I tend to agree on the point made by Enrico. The change isn't invasive and
does not affect the translations.
But there are several situations that adduser goes into a kind of
interactive mode asking questions.
Hi
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:12:11PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
My rationale was that if garbage is detected, then one cannot assume to
be able to interpret the will of the user. In this case, it's quite
easy to just ask again, instead of going on and creating an account with
data
This one time, at band camp, Enrico Zini said:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:40:09PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Enrico Zini said:
Is the information correct? [Y/n] p
pico:/# adduser enrico
adduser: The user `enrico' already exists.
pico:/#
Apparently, it
Package: adduser
Version: 3.110
Severity: minor
Hello,
thanks for maintaining adduser.
I was quite surprised when I was creating a test user and I got this:
pico:/# adduser enrico
Adding user `enrico' ...
Adding new group `enrico' (1000) ...
Adding new user `enrico' (1000) with group `enrico'
This one time, at band camp, Enrico Zini said:
Is the information correct? [Y/n] p
pico:/# adduser enrico
adduser: The user `enrico' already exists.
pico:/#
Apparently, it was happy to take 'p' for a yes.
Since the default is 'yes', the code only looks to see if you've
actively negated the
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:40:09PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Enrico Zini said:
Is the information correct? [Y/n] p
pico:/# adduser enrico
adduser: The user `enrico' already exists.
pico:/#
Apparently, it was happy to take 'p' for a yes.
Since the default
6 matches
Mail list logo
