On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:13:07PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
all non-us mirrors are bad in the sense that the don't carry current
stable,
why don't remove them altogether from the mirror list?
Why doesn't woody netslect-apt ignore non-us entries in the list ?
in some sense it does,
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:07:27PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:13:07PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
[...]
poor-man' status of non-us mirrors as of today:
http://people.debian.org/~filippo/nonus_listing
How can you expect
[CCing debian-mirrors]
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:50:59AM -0500, Jan Muszynski wrote:
The list of mirrors that netselect-apt is pulling currently includes a lot of
old non-us mirrors. This is causing the app to return bad results. For example
I tried running netselect-apt using both testing
Hi,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 03:23:13PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
[CCing debian-mirrors]
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:50:59AM -0500, Jan Muszynski wrote:
The list of mirrors that netselect-apt is pulling currently includes a lot
of
old non-us mirrors. This is causing the app to return
Package: netselect-apt
Version: 0.3.ds1-12.1
Severity: important
The list of mirrors that netselect-apt is pulling currently includes a lot of
old non-us mirrors. This is causing the app to return bad results. For example
I tried running netselect-apt using both testing and lenny as distro names.
5 matches
Mail list logo
