On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
[Mike Hommey]
Screen does that too, so that would hardly be less secure than screen.
Well, if by in /tmp you mean in /var/run/screen.
Well, that's a Debian thing. Upstream default is /tmp/screens, and last
time I checked on
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:43:37PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Thu Mar 12, 2009 at 22:37:41 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
- a more usable status line syntax, with the ability to display the first
line
of output of a specific command;
That is also possible in GNU Screen.
-
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:59:00PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
- a clearly-defined client-server model: windows are independent
entities which may be attached
I've not looked at this at all - but the idea of shared sockets
in /tmp which I recall from a previous message in the thread jumped out
at me as being a recipe for symlink attacks, if nothing else.
[Mike Hommey]
Screen does that too, so that would hardly be less secure than screen.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:19:40PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
I've not looked at this at all - but the idea of shared sockets
in /tmp which I recall from a previous message in the thread jumped out
at me as being a recipe for symlink attacks, if nothing else.
[Mike Hommey]
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:56:01PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
* Package name: tmux
Description : an alternative to screen, licensed under 3-BSD
The short description should stand on its own, not reference other software.
You can mention this package's relation with screen in
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 23:56 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Karl Ferdinand Ebert kfeb...@gmail.com
* Package name: tmux
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Nicholas Marriott n...@users.sf.net
* URL :
Am Thursday 12 March 2009 11:13:00 schrieb Guus Sliepen:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:56:01PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
* Package name: tmux
Description : an alternative to screen, licensed under 3-BSD
The short description should stand on its own, not reference other
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
- a clearly-defined client-server model: windows are independent
entities which may be attached simultaneously to multiple sessions
and viewed from multiple
On Thu Mar 12, 2009 at 22:37:41 +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
- a more usable status line syntax, with the ability to display the first line
of output of a specific command;
That is also possible in GNU Screen.
- a cleaner, modern, easily extended, BSD-licensed codebase.
That
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:37:41PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote:
The short description should stand on its own, not reference other
software.
The short description had been terminal multiplexer from the first
packaging
attempts but I did not know it had to be the line in the bug
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Karl Ferdinand Ebert kfeb...@gmail.com
* Package name: tmux
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Nicholas Marriott n...@users.sf.net
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/tmux
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description :
12 matches
Mail list logo