Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-04 Thread Alexander Wirt
Paul Traina schrieb am Freitag, den 02. Oktober 2009: So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY system, this is, I believe, the correct answer for most installations, and should not cause any problems for any installations: I still disagree that this should defined by us. I

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-04 Thread Alexander Wirt
Paul Traina schrieb am Sonntag, den 04. Oktober 2009: It's perfectly reasonable to put ALL of them under the should section if amavis needs them running first. There is no all. Since its perl and its customizable you can't know every service it uses or is able to use. Alex -- To

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-04 Thread Paul Traina
It's perfectly reasonable to put ALL of them under the should section if amavis needs them running first. On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:28 AM, Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org wrote: Paul Traina schrieb am Freitag, den 02. Oktober 2009: So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009, Paul Traina wrote: So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY system, this is, I believe, the correct answer for most installations, and should not cause any problems for any installations: ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: amavisd-new #

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-03 Thread Paul Traina
I did look at the docs before sending in the fragment. In no place in the LSB documentation does remote_fs imply that local_fs has already happened, so technically, having both is a good thing. Many scripts have both. /usr can technically be remote_fs. I was trying to change as little

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009, Paul Traina wrote: I did look at the docs before sending in the fragment. In no place in the LSB documentation does remote_fs imply that local_fs has already happened, so technically, having both is a good thing. Many So, we list both. Do we need clamav-daemon in

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-02 Thread Paul Traina
Unfortunately, the new dependency based stuff (depricating sysv-rc) breaks amavis. Yes, amavis can depend upon a lot of stuff needing to start, so it SHOULD start after those things, if they exist and are installed. The LSB stuff in /etc/init.d/amavisd-new should be tweaked or auto-

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009, Paul Traina wrote: Yes, amavis can depend upon a lot of stuff needing to start, so it SHOULD start after those things, if they exist and are installed. The LSB stuff in /etc/init.d/amavisd-new should be tweaked or auto- generated to fix this. The only way we could

Bug#520558: please re-open or reconsider

2009-10-02 Thread Paul Traina
So upon doing some more research and work, and testing on MY system, this is, I believe, the correct answer for most installations, and should not cause any problems for any installations: ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: amavisd-new # Required-Start:$syslog $network $local_fs