Hello,
On 2009 m. March 21 d., Saturday 03:57:03 you wrote:
> I found a simpler way to express the desired behavior:
>
> If DH_INTERNAL_OPTIONS specifies a set of packages,
> all packages not in that set should be excluded.
>
> I've checked in an implementation of that, which turned out to be
> si
I found a simpler way to express the desired behavior:
If DH_INTERNAL_OPTIONS specifies a set of packages,
all packages not in that set should be excluded.
I've checked in an implementation of that, which turned out to be
simpler too.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
On 2009 m. March 21 d., Saturday 01:51:21 you wrote:
> #5 seems like a better approach than #4. I don't see a need to to both,
> but it looks like your patch for #5 depends on your patch for #4.
#5 depends on #4 because #5 also needs to be able restore $dh prior
DH_INTERNAL_OPTIONS if -p/-
Modestas Vainius wrote:
> 4) ignoring -a/-i/-s/-p passed via DH_INTERNAL_OPTIONS if either of these
> options
>is specified on the command line. That's what the attached 0001 patch is
>about. You could simplify the patch a bit (i.e. avoid backup_hash() /
>restore_hash()) if you moved D
Package: debhelper
Version: 7.2.6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
consider the following debian/rules snippet:
override_dh_makeshlibs:
dh_makeshlibs -pliba -V'liba (>= 0.1)'
dh_makeshlibs -plibb -V'libb (>= 0.1)'
When this override is called via `dh binary-arch`, DH_INTERNAL
5 matches
Mail list logo
