Hi,
Ben Finney wrote:
Attached is an updated patch bundle taking the above into account.
Applied in the 3.1 branch.
(came too late for 3.0.1-8...)
Manual, though, because:
19:40 _rene_ jelmer: ping?
19:40 _rene_ jelmer: how do I upgrade the remote copy on bzr.d.o to the
new format?
19:41
Hi,
Ben Finney wrote:
Attached is an updated patch bundle addressing this bug which takes
your suggested categorisations into account.
{...}
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@
openoffice.org-filter-so52
Provides: openoffice.org2-filter-so52, openoffice.org-filter-so52
Conflicts:
On 24-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
-Description: Legacy filters (e.g. StarOffice 5.2) for OpenOffice.org
+Description: full-featured office productivity suite -- legacy filters
I think we should leave the SO 5.2 mentioning there. [… reason …]
That sounds like a good
On 22-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I'll give you a list of packages and what they belong to instead.
Attached is an updated patch bundle addressing this bug which takes
your suggested categorisations into account.
--
\ “Imagine a world without hypothetical situations.” —anonymous |
Hi,
Ben Finney wrote:
On 21-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Why should we be not allowed ro refer to Openoffice.org in the
deescription, It's well known.
The reasoning is in the Developer's Reference: the tools that will
display the synopsis already display the package name, so the
On 22-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
I'll give you a list of packages and what they belong to instead.
[…]
Thanks. I will work on a new patch for the package synopses based on
this information.
--
\“If you go to a costume party at your boss's house, wouldn't |
`\ you think a
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.0.1-7
Severity: normal
As the Developer's Reference advises, the package synopsis should not
repeat the name of the package
URL:http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-synopsis.
Lintian reports an error:
E:
tags 520611 + patch
thanks
The attached patch bundle addresses this, by unifying each of the
OpenOffice.org packages with a descriptive synopsis that does not
repeat the name “OpenOffice.org”.
--
\ “I must say that I find television very educational. The minute |
`\ somebody turns
tag 520611 - patch
thnks
Ben Finney wrote:
--- control.debug.in 2009-03-20 19:33:13 +
+++ control.debug.in 2009-03-21 10:25:37 +
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Priority: extra
Depends: ${misc:Depends}
Suggests: ${dbg-dbg-suggests}
-Description: OpenOffice.org debug symbols
+Description:
On 21-Mar-2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Why should we be not allowed ro refer to Openoffice.org in the
deescription, It's well known.
The reasoning is in the Developer's Reference: the tools that will
display the synopsis already display the package name, so the synopsis
should use its limited
10 matches
Mail list logo
