On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Hello,
> On May 16, Rafa?? Kupka wrote:
>
> > I have following idea to solve that problem. Please check if it's good
> > solution.
> Maybe, but does debootstrap actually use policy-rc.d?
No, it uses fake start-stop-daemon. But there
On May 16, Rafa?? Kupka wrote:
> I have following idea to solve that problem. Please check if it's good
> solution.
Maybe, but does debootstrap actually use policy-rc.d?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I have following idea to solve that problem. Please check if it's good
solution.
Lets add additional test similar to chrooted() in post install script.
forbidden() {
if [ -x /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d ];
/usr/sbin/policy-rc.d check_udevd start
case "$?" in
0|1|100|105)
debootstrap maintainers, how do you want to solve this?
I see three kind of solutions:
- the udev postinst checks for [ -d /debootstrap ] and does not try
to start the daemon if it exists
- debootstrap --foreign creates /etc/udev/disabled and deletes it when
it's done
- debootstrap --foreign si
On Apr 21, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> then run on the generated chroot (OS image):
>
> /debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage
>
> udev postinst will of course know it's a chroot if it's a chroot, but
> if it's running outside of chroot (like, inside qemu or natively), it
> will fail.
Why sho
Hi,
At Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:47:59 +0200,
Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mar 23, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > One thing, it's not inside a chroot. It's a session inside qemu
> > (qemubuilder --create, which is internally running debootstrap
> > --cross).
> I am not familiar with qemubuilder an
On Mar 23, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> One thing, it's not inside a chroot. It's a session inside qemu
> (qemubuilder --create, which is internally running debootstrap
> --cross).
I am not familiar with qemubuilder and I cannot find any documentation
about debootstrap --cross. Can you explain me exac
Hi,
So, the problem is:
1. udevd relies on start-stop-daemon working for stopping udevd
(debootstrap overrides start-stop-daemon with a dummy)
2. does not use start-stop-daemon to start up udevd / does not honor
invoke-rc.d rules
At Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:30:00 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
Okay, looking at it again, since problem still persists.
Log of failing udev installation looks like this:
Setting up udev (0.140-2) ...
run_command: calling: test
udevadm_test: version 140
test: unrecognized option '--subsystem=net'
run_command: calling: test
udevadm_test: version 140
test: unr
Hi,
At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:48:14 +0100,
Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mar 23, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > > > udev seems to want to start a daemon even when policy-rc.d says no,
> invoke-rc.d cannot be used because the daemon must be started directly
> without using the init script.
>
> >
On Mar 23, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > There shouldn't be another instance of udev running, so it sounds like
> Except that there is, because udevd is failing to create the
> @/org/kernel/udev/udevd abstract local domain socket which is created
> only by udevd.
Are there any news about this?
--
cia
On Mar 23, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > udev seems to want to start a daemon even when policy-rc.d says no,
invoke-rc.d cannot be used because the daemon must be started directly
without using the init script.
> There shouldn't be another instance of udev running, so it sounds like
Except that th
Hi,
At Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:07:15 +0100,
Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mar 22, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > udev seems to want to start a daemon even when policy-rc.d says no,
> > and fails. I am not quite sure why it failed this time and not any
> > other time, but I'm reporting this failur
On Mar 22, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> udev seems to want to start a daemon even when policy-rc.d says no,
> and fails. I am not quite sure why it failed this time and not any
> other time, but I'm reporting this failure anyway.
postinst checks if it is running in a chroot. Please find out why this
i
Package: udev
Version: 0.125-7
udev seems to want to start a daemon even when policy-rc.d says no,
and fails. I am not quite sure why it failed this time and not any
other time, but I'm reporting this failure anyway.
Setting up udev (0.125-7) ...
Warning: Fake start-stop-daemon called, doing
15 matches
Mail list logo
