On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:31:44 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Maybe if evince doesn't fail miserably if libspectre1 or other dependencies
of
the backends aren't found, we could exclude them from Depends and put them
on
Recommends, or maybe split the backends into separate packages (I
Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
recommends are now automatically installed, so this shouldn't happen too
often.
Except for new installs AFAIK.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:41:07 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
recommends are now automatically installed, so this shouldn't happen too
often.
Except for new installs AFAIK.
i presume that a new install via debian-installer does not circumvent
apt's default
Le jeudi 23 avril 2009 à 15:08 -0400, Michael S. Gilbert a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:41:07 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
recommends are now automatically installed, so this shouldn't happen too
often.
Except for new installs AFAIK.
i presume
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:54:14 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
i presume that a new install via debian-installer does not circumvent
apt's default behavior. is there any reason to think that this is not
the case?
It is disabled during initial installation, but even if it wasn’t, and
even
Le mardi 21 avril 2009 à 19:20 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Maybe if evince doesn't fail miserably if libspectre1 or other dependencies of
the backends aren't found, we could exclude them from Depends and put them on
Recommends, or maybe split the backends into separate packages (I
Michael Gilbert wrote:
it seems like ghostscript support in evince is a bonus feature (rather
a core component). it would be nice if the libgs8 dependency were
treated as recommends instead of a depends. this is especially poignant
Where have you seen such a dependency?
signature.asc
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:49:57 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
it seems like ghostscript support in evince is a bonus feature (rather
a core component). it would be nice if the libgs8 dependency were
treated as recommends instead of a depends. this is especially
Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:49:57 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
it seems like ghostscript support in evince is a bonus feature (rather
a core component). it would be nice if the libgs8 dependency were
treated as recommends instead of a
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:21:20 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:49:57 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
it seems like ghostscript support in evince is a bonus feature (rather
a core component). it would be nice
Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:21:20 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:49:57 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
it seems like ghostscript support in evince is a bonus feature (rather
a core
package: evince
severity: wishlist
it seems like ghostscript support in evince is a bonus feature (rather
a core component). it would be nice if the libgs8 dependency were
treated as recommends instead of a depends. this is especially poignant
since i like to remove vulnerable packages from my
12 matches
Mail list logo
