On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
tags 524363 + patch
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
FYI, the patch seems to be available in
http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=187010
I've finally been
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 06:33:46PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
I now experience again the impossibility to expunge some folder's deleted
mails :
(evolution:5041): camel-local-provider-WARNING **: Didn't get the next
message where I expected (435128) got 442552 instead
as soon as I
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 07:33:11PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Last comment on the upstream bug is asking for users with test case
for
reproducing and testing a patch against 2.32.
Would you be able to prepare a patched
tags 524363 + patch
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:33:45AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
FYI, the patch seems to be available in
http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=187010
I've finally been able to rebuild e-d-s with the patch applied, and it seems
this fixes the
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 16:05 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Hi.
FYI (and as already known from watching the upstream bug), the same
symptoms still occur with 2.32 :
(evolution:1349): camel-WARNING **: Error message was: Error storing
'~/.local/share/evolution/mail/local/Inbox (mbox)': Summary
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 17:10 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 16:05 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Hi.
FYI (and as already known from watching the upstream bug), the same
symptoms still occur with 2.32 :
(evolution:1349): camel-WARNING **: Error message was: Error
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:06 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Since you have a way to reproduce it, could you comment on the
upstream
bug?
I could, but I doubt this would help more than current existing
comments. And the mails DB is still the same as before, i.e. several
hundreds of
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 19:08 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:06 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Since you have a way to reproduce it, could you comment on the
upstream
bug?
I could, but I doubt this would help more than current existing
comments. And the mails
On dim., 2011-05-01 at 19:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Last comment on the upstream bug is asking for users with test case
for
reproducing and testing a patch against 2.32.
Would you be able to prepare a patched package for me to test ?
I'm afraid I'm not so much available these days
9 matches
Mail list logo
