I've asked bts owner to provide a list of canonical tags so we can
sync reportbug with that. Once the list will be available, we'll add
all the missing tags.
The list of canonical tags can be found here:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
Cheers,
Fabian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:07, Fabian Greffrath greffr...@leat.rub.de wrote:
I've asked bts owner to provide a list of canonical tags so we can
sync reportbug with that. Once the list will be available, we'll add
all the missing tags.
The list of canonical tags can be found here:
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 07:17, martin f krafftmadd...@debian.org wrote:
also sprach Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org [2009.06.06.0836 +0200]:
The solution I'd like to pursuit is: provide the whole set of BTS tags
This means that whenever a new tag is added, you have to upload
a new
also sprach Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org [2009.06.06.0836 +0200]:
The solution I'd like to pursuit is: provide the whole set of BTS tags
This means that whenever a new tag is added, you have to upload
a new reportbug, and that the information is redundantly stored also
in devscript's bts. I
Hi Martin,
thanks for your report.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 16:13, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote:
If I specify --tag=upstream or -T upstream on the command line, I am
told:
Ignored bogus setting for --tag: upstream
it seems that reportbug only allows l10n and patch as tags, which
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.1
Severity: normal
If I specify --tag=upstream or -T upstream on the command line, I am
told:
Ignored bogus setting for --tag: upstream
it seems that reportbug only allows l10n and patch as tags, which
are the two it offers interactively. Please allow any tag to
6 matches
Mail list logo
