On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:58:01PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Do you mean complete *.(tex|TEX|texinfo|texi)(-.) ?
At least .tex and .TEX, probably not .texinfo and .texi, but I wonder
why these extensions are selected for latex.
Someone with the time and inclination can feel free to
On 2009-04-23 20:29:47 +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:43:18PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Please add completion for latexmk. I think that it should at least
behave like latex.
Do you mean complete *.(tex|TEX|texinfo|texi)(-.) ?
At least .tex and .TEX, probably not
Package: zsh
Version: 4.3.9-4
Severity: wishlist
Please add completion for latexmk. I think that it should at least
behave like latex.
Supporting options too (listed by latexmk -h) would be fine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:43:18PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Please add completion for latexmk. I think that it should at least
behave like latex.
Do you mean complete *.(tex|TEX|texinfo|texi)(-.) ?
Supporting options too (listed by latexmk -h) would be fine.
For the record, these are
4 matches
Mail list logo