Bug#525313: zsh: please add completion for latexmk

2009-07-10 Thread Clint Adams
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:58:01PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Do you mean complete *.(tex|TEX|texinfo|texi)(-.) ? At least .tex and .TEX, probably not .texinfo and .texi, but I wonder why these extensions are selected for latex. Someone with the time and inclination can feel free to

Bug#525313: zsh: please add completion for latexmk

2009-04-24 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2009-04-23 20:29:47 +, Clint Adams wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:43:18PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Please add completion for latexmk. I think that it should at least behave like latex. Do you mean complete *.(tex|TEX|texinfo|texi)(-.) ? At least .tex and .TEX, probably not

Bug#525313: zsh: please add completion for latexmk

2009-04-23 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: zsh Version: 4.3.9-4 Severity: wishlist Please add completion for latexmk. I think that it should at least behave like latex. Supporting options too (listed by latexmk -h) would be fine. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500,

Bug#525313: zsh: please add completion for latexmk

2009-04-23 Thread Clint Adams
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:43:18PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Please add completion for latexmk. I think that it should at least behave like latex. Do you mean complete *.(tex|TEX|texinfo|texi)(-.) ? Supporting options too (listed by latexmk -h) would be fine. For the record, these are