Hello, I mistakenly closed an IRC query regarding treecc -- I hope it was you contacting me. Let's try to solve this mess about it: is "your" treecc the same as ours?
From the description, it seems to serve quite the same goal: -->treecc 0.1-4<-- Description: Concrete syntax tree generator TreeCC generates C++ classes to represent the concrete syntax tree for a given Yacc/Bison grammar, along with abstract visitor base classes and visitor adapter classes with standard behaviour (descend into subnodes, throw an exception). -->treecc 0.3.10-1<-- Description: code generation for compiler development treecc is designed to assist in the development of compilers and other language-based tools. It manages the generation of code to handle abstract syntax trees and operations upon the trees. . This package contains the main binary. Downloading the source though, they're quite different and -- it seems -- from different authors: -->0.1-4<-- http://www.hogyros.de/ (currently in "offline mode" though) -->0.3.10-1<-- http://www.gnu.org/software/dotgnu/ I also see that your treecc already has 19 as popcon score, while ours hasn't been uploaded yet. And we won't upload it, because the archive would regard it as a new version, fixing things the bad way for our purposes. Honestly, I believe "hogyros" could have chosen an unused name for his software :) Since both are headed towards developers, I fail to think at a treecc/treecc-dev solution. One solution might be calling our treecc "treecc-gnu", or similar ("gnutreecc", [..]). Any other idea? Mono team: any ideas from your POV? Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature