Bug#526505: packages not reported as kept back

2009-05-07 Thread Michael Vogt
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:58:08PM +0200, Maximilian Gaukler wrote: I found another case in which a package is not shown as kept back: If a upgradeable package fails the first sanity check (if check_changes_for_sanity(...), ca. line 195), its name is added to pkgs_kept_back. If it passes

Bug#526505: packages not reported as kept back

2009-05-01 Thread Maximilian Gaukler
I found another case in which a package is not shown as kept back: If a upgradeable package fails the first sanity check (if check_changes_for_sanity(...), ca. line 195), its name is added to pkgs_kept_back. If it passes the first, but fails the second sanity check (for example if it depends