severity 526546 important
thanks
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:18:48AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
>
> right, I missed that part. So this is indeed just important.
>
Thanks!
> > I will followup with upstream regarding more architecture supports, but in
> > the
> > meantime what's the reason not
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:23:14PM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:43:36PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing
> > from the arch rather than spew a generic "unspported arch" message.
> Sorry, I didn't intend
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:43:36PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
> severity 526546 serious
> thanks
>
> Quite rude to change the severity without notifying the reporter.
>
> At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing
> from the arch rather than spew a generic "unspp
severity 526546 serious
thanks
Quite rude to change the severity without notifying the reporter.
At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing
from the arch rather than spew a generic "unspported arch" message.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lis
Package: lxc
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: eabi
Your package failed to build with the following error:
> mkdir .libs
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I../../src -DLXCPATH=\"/var/lib/lxc\"
> -DLXCBINDIR=\"/usr/bin\" -DLXCLIBEXECDIR=\"/usr/lib
5 matches
Mail list logo