Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Mike Hommey | 2009-05-08 20:36:04 [+0200]: IMHO this should be fixed, because ia64 is definitelz not the same as X86_64. As for PLATFORM(MAC) there seems to be abuse with it, and it seems to be used in several places where a check for x86_64 architecture would be the right thing to do. It is

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:27:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: * Mike Hommey | 2009-05-07 22:12:38 [+0200]: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: -#if PLATFORM(MAC) +#if PLATFORM(MAC) ||

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-08 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Mike Hommey | 2009-05-08 20:36:04 [+0200]: IMHO this should be fixed, because ia64 is definitelz not the same as X86_64. As for PLATFORM(MAC) there seems to be abuse with it, and it seems to be used in several places where a check for x86_64 architecture would be the right thing to do. I've

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: -#if PLATFORM(MAC) +#if PLATFORM(MAC) || defined(__x86_64__) I think this should just all be replaced with #if PLATFORM(X86_64) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-07 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Mike Hommey | 2009-05-07 22:12:38 [+0200]: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc wrote: -#if PLATFORM(MAC) +#if PLATFORM(MAC) || defined(__x86_64__) I think this should just all be replaced with #if PLATFORM(X86_64) uhm. I've just

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-07 Thread John Haitas
I am sure most of you are aware of this, but I feel it is necessary to point out anyway - x86-64 (or amd64) and IA-64 are distinctly different (and incompatible) architectures. AFAIK there has not been a port of Darwin to IA-64.

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-06 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
tags 527096 + patch thanks * Kurt Roeckx | 2009-05-05 18:27:38 [+0200]: ormat-security -Wno-format-y2k -Wundef -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -fno-exceptions -fvisibility=hidden -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:28:54PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: The code is 32bit asm and tests for SSE2. All x86_64 boxes have SSE2 afaik. The attached patch fixes the build issue. However I can't test the result because I run OOM in the final link... Yes, afaik all amd64 boxes

Bug#527096: webkit: FTBFS: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

2009-05-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: webkit Version: 1.1.6-1 Severity: serious Hi, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of webkit_1.1.6-1 on excelsior by sbuild/amd64 98 Build started at 20090505-0604 [...] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0), libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.10), libpango1.0-dev