Hello Chris,
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
>> Removing the 'chroot .' should be all that's necessary, plus testing of
>> course.
>
> You need to remove the "--exclude=target" bit too, as that's not supported
> in busybox tar. (This was only a paranoid mea
Joey Hess wrote:
> Removing the 'chroot .' should be all that's necessary, plus testing of
> course.
You need to remove the "--exclude=target" bit too, as that's not supported
in busybox tar. (This was only a paranoid measure anyway.)
Patch attached for clarity. Tested using d-i daily i386 build
Joey Hess wrote:
> chroot . tar c . --exclude=target | \
> (chdir /target && tar xv) | \
>
> Removing the 'chroot .' should be all that's necessary, plus testing of
> course.
very nice. i'll test it tomorrow.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hey Joey, are you aware of other places we could also change the use
> of tar (certainly I can look by myself but I'm first trying to use
> your great memory of historical stuff in D-I..:-))
TTBOMK, this is the only place in d-i where we *create* a tar file, and
so the o
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> Package: live-installer
> Severity: normal
>
> busybox-udeb now supports tar creation, so this code can be fixed to
> not use tar from the live system:
Hey Joey, are you aware of other places we could also change the use
of tar (certainly I can look by mys
Package: live-installer
Severity: normal
busybox-udeb now supports tar creation, so this code can be fixed to
not use tar from the live system:
# use tar from inside the live filesystem to create
# the tarball, because busybox tar in d-i does not
#
6 matches
Mail list logo