Hi all,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 17.02.2010 20:50, schrieb Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
Looks good, feel free to upload it when you feel like it.
Thanks, but I am not a DD and have no upload rights. :(
I am fine with those changes as
Am 17.02.2010 20:50, schrieb Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
Looks good, feel free to upload it when you feel like it.
Thanks, but I am not a DD and have no upload rights. :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 17.02.2010 20:50, schrieb Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
Looks good, feel free to upload it when you feel like it.
Thanks, but I am not a DD and have no upload rights. :(
Well, I will get to it soon enough, and any other DD that is in the loop,
Am Dienstag, den 16.02.2010, 14:16 -0200 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh:
Would you agree on _updateconfig and _restoreconfig ?
I've prepared an NMU to finally implement this feature, please find it
attached to this mail. I tried to stay close to what has been done in
the quilt package, but
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.02.2010, 14:16 -0200 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh:
Would you agree on _updateconfig and _restoreconfig ?
I've prepared an NMU to finally implement this feature, please find it
attached to this mail. I tried to stay
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
@Henrique: If I renamed my initial scripts to dh_config-scripts_update
and dh_config-scripts_restore and renamed the dh sequence addon to
config-scripts.pm, would you then accept them in autotools-dev? The
Yes.
--
One disk to rule them all, One
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com writes:
Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2010, 12:43 -0800 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
I'm not sure whether these should go into the autoconf binary
package or a separate binary package. I see both practices in
the archive.
Maybe it would make sense to introduce an
Am 05.02.2010 22:06, schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
The scripts I provided only delete files that changed during autoreconf
and that seems to work very well in most cases. In cases where a file
should not be deleted, one could pass -X parameters to
dh_autoreconf_clean. But the scripts could maybe
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com writes:
OK, now what's the consent on these scripts? Will they be included in
the next autoconf package?
I'm still trying to figure out exactly what I want to do. I
probably won't have time to actually take action until the
weekend, or perhaps Monday
Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2010, 12:43 -0800 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
I'm a little concerned about maintaining a new set of scripts
that I don't use myself, so I would probably have to put in a bit
of time to convert my doschk or fmtools packages to use these
scripts too.
I believe the scripts will be
Hmm, this is MUCH better than the other scripts and/or namings proposed.
Since you already asked if to be added to the autoconf package, I will just
keep monitoring the bug as long as I get the CCs. If you decide it is best
done in autotools-dev, when you reach the final version of the script,
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Adding an optional command to debhelper that likely does not do the
right thing for a fairly large percentage of packages (my experience
with running autoreconf and having it actually work, in the real world,
is not exactly stellar) would be
Am 04.02.2010 21:29, schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
Anyway, this approach should allow us to build packages including
autoreconf with a simple
%:
dh --with autoreconf $@
debian/rules file which would be great. If you don't want to libtoolize,
and the package includes the libtool macros
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 10:11 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
Julien, I've got one thing to add to your scripts. You just check for
files that have been changed during autoreconf and remove them.
However, in most (all?) cases the directory autom4te.cache will be
created by autoreconf.
Am 05.02.2010 10:12, schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
New files are also changed files in some way and will be removed as
well. But we don't have to care about new directories because
directories don't appear in a diff.
I know, but it feels cleaner to not have empty (and actually
useless)
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
He wants you to include the debhelper commands, because autoconf
includes autoreconf and those are special dh_* commands for autoreconf.
But they could also be included in debhelper directly if you think this
would be better (and if joeyh shares this opinion).
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 15:53 -0500 schrieb Joey Hess:
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
He wants you to include the debhelper commands, because autoconf
includes autoreconf and those are special dh_* commands for autoreconf.
But they could also be included in debhelper directly if you think
reassign 527581 autoconf
notfound 527581 20090611.1
found 527581 2.65-3
thanks
As the original author of the patches discussed here, I must say that I
like JAK's approach even more. However, since it calls autoreconf, it
should be reassigned to the autoconf (or maybe automake, CC'ed both
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 21:06 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
reassign 527581 autoconf
notfound 527581 20090611.1
found 527581 2.65-3
thanks
As the original author of the patches discussed here, I must say that I
like JAK's approach even more. However, since it calls autoreconf, it
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 12:30 -0800 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com writes:
As the original author of the patches discussed here, I must say that I
like JAK's approach even more. However, since it calls autoreconf, it
should be reassigned to the autoconf
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com writes:
As the original author of the patches discussed here, I must say that I
like JAK's approach even more. However, since it calls autoreconf, it
should be reassigned to the autoconf (or maybe automake, CC'ed both
maintainers) package. Since it's
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:01:16PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:47:36AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
I am considering uploading a DELAYED 7 NMU for this bug
tonight or tomorrow. HMH, if you have plans to
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:27:00PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:01:16PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:47:36AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
I am considering uploading a
23 matches
Mail list logo
