On Tuesday 12 May 2009 06:37:22 Sergey Korobitsin wrote:
I think that replacing 'jabber' is wrong because many legacy transports
uses jabber package to operate, jabber-muc for example.
actually, only jabberd2 support is included in jabber-muc debian packages.
i'll be glad to merge jabberd1
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 16:38:15 Sergey Korobitsin wrote:
Thank you, I've just updated jabber-muc, and jabber1 does not need for me
now, but I see there may be other old extensions that use jabber1 to run,
or may be a situation of using 2 different jabber servers on different
ports etc.
I'm
On Вторник 12 мая 2009 21:02:16 Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote:
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 06:37:22 Sergey Korobitsin wrote:
I think that replacing 'jabber' is wrong because many legacy transports
uses jabber package to operate, jabber-muc for example.
actually, only jabberd2 support is included in
I think that replacing 'jabber' is wrong because many legacy transports
uses jabber package to operate, jabber-muc for example.
--
Best regards, Sergey Korobitsin
Arta Software, Astana, KZ
mailto:undertaker{at}arta.kz
xmpp:underta...@jabber.arta.kz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: jabberd2
Version: 2.2.8-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpbO72ny
In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following:
- debian/control
- Conflict/Replace jabber for
5 matches
Mail list logo