Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-06-09 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 package ghostscript tags 528386 pending thanks Hi Till, On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: - Splitted off the CUPS-related files into its own package, so that the requirements of cups and cups-client for the

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Jonas Smedegaard [2009-05-25 0:11 +0200]: My comment was more general, however: Instead of developing on the Ubuntu package and then backport the changes to Debian, I recommend doing it the other way around: Join our team, apply changes to the Debian package, and pull the result to Ubuntu.

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-25 Thread Till Kamppeter
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: perl-base is sufficient if no modules are loaded, which is the case for the postinst routines. Perl-base is part of base so need not be declared as a dependency (except for versioned dependencies). You are right that defoma should care for its own dependencies. All

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:01:42AM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The Debian package has evolved, but above changes are pretty simple, so I can easily reimplement using the new packaging structure of 8.64-4. I

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-25 Thread Till Kamppeter
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: By Debian social norms, Masayuki Hatta has to accept it. He is a quiet guy, however, and these mails are cc'ed the package, reaching all team members. So I would say that the lack of response, keyed with earlier approval of moving to Git in the collab-maint group, can

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-24 Thread Till Kamppeter
Please merge the following Ubuntu package version of Ghostscript into Debian: 8.64.dfsg.1-0ubuntu11 It has the following fixes and new feature (in addition to the ones of 0ubuntu9 and earlier): - pstoraster did not work when called with an input file name as the 6th command line argument.

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Till and others, On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: Please merge the following Ubuntu package version of Ghostscript into Debian: - pstoraster did not work when called with an input file name as the 6th

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-24 Thread Till Kamppeter
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Till and others, On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: Please merge the following Ubuntu package version of Ghostscript into Debian: - pstoraster did not work when called with an input

Bug#528386: More Ghostscript changes which need to get into Debian: Split off a ghostscript-cups package

2009-05-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:09:18PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 08:44:43PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote: - Splitted off the CUPS-related files into its own package, so that the requirements