Bug#530321: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#530321: virtualbox-ose: Drop /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg

tag 530321 pending thanks > And yes, I've forgotten to adjust the following files: > ./virtualbox-ose.install > ./patches/09-initscript.dpatch Including the file if it is still there doesn't appear to be a problem. > ..and the submittodebian script apparently does not handle removed files > (pro

Bug#530321: virtualbox-ose: Drop /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg

Yes, Felix is right about the testcase. After all, you would have to purge virtualbox-ose and then install it again to fix this (thinking as a user). And yes, I've forgotten to adjust the following files: ./virtualbox-ose.install ./patches/09-initscript.dpatch ..and the submittodebian script ap

Bug#530321: virtualbox-ose: Drop /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg

tags 530321 - moreinfo thanks The scenario that causes the problem: - User installs virtualbox-ose - User removes virtualbox-ose, /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg is not removed as it's a config file - User installs virtualbox-2.2 (upstream proprietary package), which removes /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg in postinst as

Bug#530321: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#530321: virtualbox-ose: Drop /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg: not required and conflicts with upstream's -ose package

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 03:48:43AM +0200, Daniel Hahler wrote: > In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following: Hmm, the patch does not appear to be complete, or is there a reason for still installing vbox.cfg and including it in /etc/init.d/virtualbox? > * Remove usage/r

Bug#530321: virtualbox-ose: Drop /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg: not required and conflicts with upstream's -ose package

Package: virtualbox-ose Version: 2.2.2-dfsg-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch In Ubuntu, we've applied the attached patch to achieve the following: * Remove usage/references to /etc/vbox/vbox.cfg (as handled upstre