severity 532275 serious
thanks
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I've requested the removal of libgda2. This bug will become RC when that
happens
(if it can be removed before this bug is fixed).
libgda2 removed from unstable (c.f. #535356), thus raising severity.
Cheers,
Emilio
signature.asc
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
You're package is now the only one blocking the libgda2 removal. Would be nice
if you could fix this soon.
I've requested the removal of libgda2. This bug will become RC when that happens
(if it can be removed before this bug is fixed).
Cheers,
Emilio
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió:
gnotime build depends on libgda2-dev, which we want to remove from
the archive, and it's the only reverse dependency.
The build dependency seems unnecessary though. The resulting package
doesn't depend on any gda package, and the package still builds fine
Package: gnotime
Version: 2.3.1~snapshot20090531-1
Severity: important
Hi,
gnotime build depends on libgda2-dev, which we want to remove from
the archive, and it's the only reverse dependency.
The build dependency seems unnecessary though. The resulting package
doesn't depend on any gda
4 matches
Mail list logo