2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
alread available, whatever causes your error may still be present.
Therefore I'm digging into this and will be talkin to the libtool
folks. Stay tuned.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
alread available, whatever causes your error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:31:44PM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:53:46AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Itai,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:10:20AM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although you're only reporting this problem with a rc and the final is
alread available, whatever causes your error may
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu
Any other suggestions?
Although you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 01:58:37PM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:59:23AM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:33:23AM
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
You've asked those patches before, and I told you not (as upstream)
to worry about those pathces to autogenerated files): I agree that
they are not of concern for upstream.
But you are *not* patching _generated_ files here. You are patching
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
package netatalk
tags 533141 pending
thanks
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 03:52:02PM +0200, Frank Lahm wrote:
2009/6/16 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
You've asked those patches before, and I told you not (as
upstream) to worry about those
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my system,
but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild the package from
source to enable openSSL.
Going through the following
apt-get source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Itai,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:10:20AM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my
system, but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild
the package from source to
2009/6/15 Itai Seggev is+deb...@cs.hmc.edu:
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my
system,
but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild the package
from
source to enable openSSL.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:53:46AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Itai,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:10:20AM -0500, Itai Seggev wrote:
Okay, perhaps I am cluless or there's something seriously wrong with my
system, but this has never failed me in the past. I am try to rebuild
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
