Bug#533360: libc6: signalfd creation with SFD_* flags breaks under 2.9-15

2009-06-17 Thread Nick Black
Aurelien Jarno left as an exercise for the reader: > Nick Black a écrit : > This should now be fixed in version 2.9.15+b1 which should already be on > the mirrors. I can confirm a fix on amd64 2.6.30 with 2.9-15+b1. Thanks, Aurelien! -- Nick Black

Bug#533360: libc6: signalfd creation with SFD_* flags breaks under 2.9-15

2009-06-17 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Nick Black a écrit : > Aurelien Jarno left as an exercise for the reader: >> notfound 533360 2.9-13 >> found 533360 2.9-15 >> thanks >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:06:47PM -0400, Nick Black wrote: >>> Package: libc6 >>> Version: 2.9-13 >> Given your description that's clearly the wrong version. >

Bug#533360: libc6: signalfd creation with SFD_* flags breaks under 2.9-15

2009-06-16 Thread Nick Black
Aurelien Jarno left as an exercise for the reader: > notfound 533360 2.9-13 > found 533360 2.9-15 > thanks > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:06:47PM -0400, Nick Black wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.9-13 > > Given your description that's clearly the wrong version. I reported the bug from a

Bug#533360: libc6: signalfd creation with SFD_* flags breaks under 2.9-15

2009-06-16 Thread Aurelien Jarno
notfound 533360 2.9-13 found 533360 2.9-15 thanks On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:06:47PM -0400, Nick Black wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.9-13 Given your description that's clearly the wrong version. > Severity: important > > > Howdy! > > This morning, I upgraded libc6 et al from 2.9-13 to

Bug#533360: libc6: signalfd creation with SFD_* flags breaks under 2.9-15

2009-06-16 Thread Nick Black
Package: libc6 Version: 2.9-13 Severity: important Howdy! This morning, I upgraded libc6 et al from 2.9-13 to 2.9-15. Immediately, one of my unit tests began failing with a -1 return from signalfd(): 14|* Error (Invalid argument) in Signalfd(): Couldn't generate signalfd from -1/526336 wi