Bug#533555: libdumb: Licence for DUMB v0.9.3 makes it non-free

2010-02-02 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:50:30PM +, Marcos Marado wrote: Greetings, The author of this package seems to think that the license doesn't make it non-free: t's an obvious joke...clause 6 makes it clear that 4 and 5 are jokes and it's a free software license. [1] I think that this

Bug#533555: libdumb: Licence for DUMB v0.9.3 makes it non-free

2010-01-22 Thread Marcos Marado
Greetings, The author of this package seems to think that the license doesn't make it non-free: t's an obvious joke...clause 6 makes it clear that 4 and 5 are jokes and it's a free software license. [1] I think that this should be brought up to debian-legal, and if they still think that the

Bug#533555: libdumb: Licence for DUMB v0.9.3 makes it non-free

2009-12-23 Thread Marcos Marado
Reported upstream: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2920132group_id=31756atid=403156 -- Marcos Marado -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#533555: libdumb: Licence for DUMB v0.9.3 makes it non-free

2009-07-09 Thread Robert Millan
Don't forget this one. Sounds like a great excuse for luuuve. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:36:53PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: 4. If you are using the Program in someone else's bedroom on any Monday at 3:05 pm, you are not allowed to modify the Program for ten minutes. Honey, this license

Bug#533555: libdumb: Licence for DUMB v0.9.3 makes it non-free

2009-06-18 Thread Andres Mejia
Package: libdumb Version: 1:0.9.3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 The license to libdumb now has two additional clauses making libdumb non-free. Clause 4 is the only clause that's clarified. Here are the other two. 5. Users who wish to use DUMB for the specific purpose of playing