tags 534724 + wontfix
thanks
> Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> >
> >Sorry for the late reply. I'm absolutely willing to submit small and useful
> >bits, I'm just a bit unclear about the policy. If bootup messages are
> >intentionally excluded, then some of the current rules should in fact be
> >drop
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Sorry for the late reply. I'm absolutely willing to submit small and useful
bits, I'm just a bit unclear about the policy. If bootup messages are
intentionally excluded, then some of the current rules should in fact be dropped
as well. Does bootup also mean that hot-pl
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:23:13PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > Attached please find a patch to extend kernel logcheck rules. You might
> > want do
> > check the changes line by line as some of them could still be specific for
> > my
> > systems.
>
> Thanks for your contribution. Unf
Frédéric Brière wrote:
Thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, I don't think anyone has
the time to go through these 599 rules and sort out that big pile. From
a quick glance, most of these appear to be bootup messages, which are
willingly not included in logcheck-database.
What about
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 07:23:13PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Attached please find a patch to extend kernel logcheck rules. You might want
> do
> check the changes line by line as some of them could still be specific for my
> systems.
Thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately, I don't
5 matches
Mail list logo
