* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100331 14:00]:
* martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) [100331 13:52]:
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]:
* martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]:
Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to
Hi,
* martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]:
Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481?
why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a
dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything.
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) [100331 13:52]:
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]:
* martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]:
Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481?
why does the binnmu fix the problem? was
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]:
* martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]:
Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481?
why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a
dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly
4 matches
Mail list logo