Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

2010-04-03 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100331 14:00]: * martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) [100331 13:52]: also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to

Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

2010-03-31 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

2010-03-31 Thread Andreas Barth
* martin f krafft (madd...@madduck.net) [100331 13:52]: also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was

Bug#536481: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

2010-03-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly