Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 09:19 -0300, Pavel Kalian wrote: > The linked document says “Debian packages *should* not use > convenience copies”, is it now changed to a hard requirement? I personally would not sponsor packages where I knew there were embedded code copies. Others may have less strict

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

Paul… Many thanks for the review. > On Apr 23, 2016, at 00:34, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 16:20 -0300, Pavel Kalian wrote: > >> Unfortunately I still did not receive any useful feedback from >> anybody, neither on Debian GIS mailing list, or any information on

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 16:20 -0300, Pavel Kalian wrote: > Unfortunately I still did not receive any useful feedback from > anybody, neither on Debian GIS mailing list, or any information on > where I should submit something for review. Generally it works like this:

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 16:20 -0300, Pavel Kalian wrote: > (yes, the stuff present in the upstream git tree and not needed to > build on linux is stripped from them) I forgot to mention that you should use Files-Excluded in debian/copyright so that others can reproduce your removals:

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

Antoine… Unfortunately I still did not receive any useful feedback from anybody, neither on Debian GIS mailing list, or any information on where I should submit something for review. If you know what to look at, you may have a look at the launchpad sources at opencpn_4.2.0.orig.tar.xz

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

Hi Pavel, Is there any progress on the OpenCPN packaging? It would be great to see this in stretch! >From what I remember, the next step here is to publish your source tree somewhere we can review, or just reuse the Ubuntu PPA. How does that sound? a. -- Lorsque l'on range des objets dans

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

Hi... On 03/21/2015 07:47 AM, anarcat wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:52:55PM -0600, Pavel Kalian wrote: Hi... Hi Pavel, I'm an upstream developer and managing the PPA on Launchpad. Thanks for chiming in! It's certainly a good way to try to resolve this in the long run. :) (and sorry

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:52:55PM -0600, Pavel Kalian wrote: Hi... Hi Pavel, I'm an upstream developer and managing the PPA on Launchpad. Thanks for chiming in! It's certainly a good way to try to resolve this in the long run. :) (and sorry for the delay, i wasn't in cc to the bug report so

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On 2015-03-21 13:42:51, Pavel Kalian wrote: On 03/21/2015 07:47 AM, anarcat wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:52:55PM -0600, Pavel Kalian wrote: [...] I would have been able to install the wxwidgets packages from wheezy (which seems like a better option than sid IMHO) if the dependencies

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 15:45 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: Yeah, that's weird. I haven't investigated why it happened... https://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wxwidgets2.8.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wxwidgets2.8/news/20141021T163919Z.html https://bugs.debian.org/748169

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On 03/21/2015 07:18 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: Maybe we can have the two packages diverge (between ubuntu and Debian) at that level. Eventually, those differences would go away as 3.0 gets propagated everywhere... Maybe with some macros and ifdefs you could default to wx 3.0 but allow

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On 2015-03-21 22:56:09, Pavel Kalian wrote: On 03/21/2015 07:18 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] While it can be built, it is pretty sure there are issues in how it works with wx3 on Linux, it received very little testing upstream and certainly won't get any but totally trivial and safe wx3

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On 2015-03-21 20:38:58, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 15:45 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: Yeah, that's weird. I haven't investigated why it happened... https://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wxwidgets2.8.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wxwidgets2.8/news/20141021T163919Z.html

Bug#538067: status of the opencpn PPA for inclusion in Debian

On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 21:18 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: TLDR; 2.8 was deliberately removed from jessie and is being kept from entering back because it is unmaintained upstream. I guess the remaining question is why it's even still in sid. :) pabs olly: how come wxwidgets2.8 is still in