On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Roderich
Schupproderich.sch...@googlemail.com wrote:
i.e. VGA-0 is gone. But perhaps VGA-0 _instead_ of HDMI-0 would be more
correct,
because there's actually an analog monitor connected to this port?
What actual ports does your board have?
--
To
Does xf86-video-ati from git master work? If it does I'll fix up the
6.12-branch. I think I see what the problem is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alex Deucheralexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
What actual ports does your board have?
The board is an ASUSTeK Computer Inc. EAH3650 Silent,
similar (but not identical) to
http://de.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=2l2=8l3=637l4=0model=2059modelmenu=2
It has 2 DVI-I sockets.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Alex Deucheralexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Does xf86-video-ati from git master work? If it does I'll fix up the
Yes, git master works. With this, xrandr shows
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2960 x 1050, maximum 3000 x 1050
HDMI-0 connected 1680x1050+0+0
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Roderich
Schupproderich.sch...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Alex Deucheralexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
Does xf86-video-ati from git master work? If it does I'll fix up the
Yes, git master works. With this, xrandr shows
Screen 0:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Alex Deucheralexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
way in the bios tables. If we exposed them as a single DVI-I or
HDMI+VGA, it would be confusing to some set of users. Depending on
how prevalent each type is, it may make sense to quirk one or the
other.
That indeed
After browsing the upstream changelog I reverted
commit a00db22e52631ccbf5bbcbd8175802f9b3407521
Author: Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Jun 4 09:57:22 2009 -0400
atom: connector quirk
Some r6xx cards have a VGA and an HDMI port with
a shared ddc line listed as an
7 matches
Mail list logo
