Le mardi 18 août 2009 à 19:19 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> Why is gmyth going away? Don't you think it might have been a good idea
> to mention this upstream anyway?
http://bugs.debian.org/538718
I just discovered this with the present bug report, BTW.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouet
Bastien Nocera (18/08/2009):
> Why is gmyth going away? Don't you think it might have been a good
> idea to mention this upstream anyway?
Ask its maintainer? He is the one who wants to have it removed. I'm
just trying to sort out various FTBFSes I encounter.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Descripti
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 02:18 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: totem
> Version: 2.26.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> gmyth's maintainer would like to see this source package removed, along
> with its libmyth-dev binary, which you build-depend on. I've noticed
> th
Cyril Brulebois (18/08/2009):
> tag 542127 patch
> thanks
lalala.
Mraw,
KiBi.
diff -u totem-2.26.3/debian/control totem-2.26.3/debian/control
--- totem-2.26.3/debian/control
+++ totem-2.26.3/debian/control
@@ -7,8 +7,6 @@
quilt,
python-support (>= 0.6),
tag 542127 patch
thanks
Cyril Brulebois (18/08/2009):
> gmyth's maintainer would like to see this source package removed,
> along with its libmyth-dev binary, which you build-depend on. I've
> noticed that while reassigning #538718 from his package to
> ftp.debian.org
Same goes for the upnp one.
Package: totem
Version: 2.26.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
gmyth's maintainer would like to see this source package removed, along
with its libmyth-dev binary, which you build-depend on. I've noticed
that while reassigning #538718 from his package to ftp.debian.org
Mraw,
KiBi.
6 matches
Mail list logo
