Bug#542214: (no subject)

2009-08-18 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
So is the answer that V4L1 is simply no longer supported? If so, then it's understandable. However, if something is still supported it's supposed to work. -- Alexey Feldgendler ale...@feldgendler.ru [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#542214: (no subject)

2009-08-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:35 +0200, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: So is the answer that V4L1 is simply no longer supported? If so, then it's understandable. However, if something is still supported it's supposed to work. V4L1 is supported on a best-effort basis by the compatibility layer in