Craig Small a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:16:19AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
While I support the use of this format, I am worried that having it suggested
by dh-make would create a standard despite it is still a draft. For instance,
if hundreds of package use a given field name with a g
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:16:19AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> While I support the use of this format, I am worried that having it suggested
> by dh-make would create a standard despite it is still a draft. For instance,
> if hundreds of package use a given field name with a given syntax, it bec
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 09:16:19AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have just found the bug #542863 reported on dh-make, where Guillaume
> suggests Craig to use the machine-readable format for the template of
> debian/copyright.
> While I support the use of this format, I am worried that having i
Dear Guillaume, Craig and Steve,
I have just found the bug #542863 reported on dh-make, where Guillaume suggests
Craig to use the machine-readable format for the template of debian/copyright.
While I support the use of this format, I am worried that having it suggested
by dh-make would create a s
4 matches
Mail list logo
