[2009-09-07 13:44] Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > > Which is also correct, invoke-rc.d is to be used in maintainer scripts,
> > > its
> > > result codes in default mode of operation are optimized for that usage.
> >
> > Yeah, I know that. And that is okay. However if it does not start a
> >
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Patrick Schoenfeld]
recently I stumbled across some behaviour in invoke-rc.d which I
consider somehow broken. When trying to start a service with
invoke-rc.d it
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:41:18PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Patrick Schoenfeld]
recently I stumbled across some behaviour in invoke-rc.d which I
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
sorry.. what?! Why is invoke-rc.d not starting services in the default
runlevel? Or did you want to bring this in relation to the above stated
LSB header?
The script is listed as default-stop for runlevel 2. That means it is not
to be started in
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:44:03PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yeah, I know that. And that is okay. However if it does not start a
service (for whatever reason) it should say WHY. It does so for
Well, I am not oposed to that at all, it would be useful to add a verbose
or even
5 matches
Mail list logo
