Am Sonntag, den 20.09.2009, 16:32 +0200 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin:
I'll write to the upstream author about the nameing conflict.
Thanks for taking care of this!
The best way to go would be to rename the upstream package. What's the
purpose of the sinfo binary in the slurm-llnl package? If it
Hi
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:26:04PM +0200, oliv...@na.icar.cnr.it wrote:
Hi,
I do agree with Manuel objections.
Maybe you can call it ant-sinfo, from the name of the laboratory where
the tool is developed.
Best Regards
--
Gennaro
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Manuel
Hi Gaudenz!
As it seems, the executable is named sinfo, which is already supplied
in the SLURM batch system package (slurm-llnl). Because both packages
are useful on clusters, a Conflicts does not make sense, so renaming
seems to be the best option. I CC'ed Gennaro (slurm-llnl maintainer) so
he
Hi,
I do agree with Manuel objections.
Maybe you can call it ant-sinfo, from the name of the laboratory where
the tool is developed.
Best Regards
--
Gennaro
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Hi Gaudenz!
As it seems, the executable is named sinfo, which is already
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org
* Package name: sinfo
Version : 0.0.33
Upstream Author : Jürgen Rinas jri...@gmx.de
* URL : http://www.ant.uni-bremen.de/whomes/rinas/sinfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
5 matches
Mail list logo
