Hi all!
I am eagerly awaiting the split-up rails upload. My package, camping,
uses active record and for this I always depended on rails to provide
it. Currently, rails is not installable (#580338 !) in Sid and Squeeze
nor are the libactive{record,support}-ruby around anymore in favor of
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Any ETA when we can hope this version in debian?
Also, shouldn't activemodel be packaged?
I've pushed 2 or 3 modifications to the git repository to make lintian
more happy.
Best regards
Laurent Bigonville
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:05:57PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
libi18n-ruby1.8 ( 0.1.3)
There is no wath file for this package, so we haven't detected that
0.1.3 was released. Roberto, could you pick this up?
Note that the status of the package in the team archive is messy,
not
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:05:57PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:30:39PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:55:05AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
Split up of rails is overdue, and that is mostly my fault. By the time
I've decided splitting
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:30:39PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:55:05AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
Split up of rails is overdue, and that is mostly my fault. By the time
I've decided splitting up rails was a good idea, Roberto C. Sanchez
has already uploaded
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:43:14PM +0100]:
(…)
You identify the main problem with Ruby packaging in Debian as being
the inability to co-install several versions of applications like rails,
because the different versions depend on different versions of some
libraries, which
Adam Majer dijo [Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:36:23AM -0600]:
This may be correct, but if you look at C/C++ ABI and API, they are not
stable either. Yet, it is possible to install multiple versions of a
given library. C/C++ linker address this problem. In Ruby, that linker
is currently gems at
On 22/02/10 at 01:55 -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
Ruby problems in Debian - no gems support
-
Problems that rails exposes in Debian is lack of concurrent version
installs. For example, with a split up rails it is impossible to have
rails 2.x and rails 3.x
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
4. Add support for packaged gems in Debian please :)
1st, I do not blame anyone for anything. I simply would like to point
out areas where Debian is lagging behind other distributions. (using
word 'lagging' without intended offence
On 23/02/10 at 11:36 -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
This may be correct, but if you look at C/C++ ABI and API, they are not
stable either. Yet, it is possible to install multiple versions of a
given library. C/C++ linker address this
This message is directed to everyone that has some interest in having
rails 2.3.5+ in Squeeze.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:39:53AM -0500, Richard Hurt wrote:
On 2/19/10 8:33 AM| Feb 19, 2010, Malcolm Locke wrote:
I think probably most users have abandoned this package and are now
using gem
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:55:05AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
Split up of rails is overdue, and that is mostly my fault. By the time
I've decided splitting up rails was a good idea, Roberto C. Sanchez
has already uploaded libactiverecord-ruby - I took too much time (and
I was resistant to
12 matches
Mail list logo
