Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires
>> lablgtk but in fact it FTBFS when the package
>> liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev is not installed, so I am tempted to
>> believe the bug
Am 27.03.10 14:40, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
> tags 549463 help
> thanks
>
> I'm packaging the new upstream version monotone-viz 1.0.2 from
> http://oandrieu.nerim.net/monotone-viz/monotone-viz-1.0.2-nolablgtk.tar.gz
>
> The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires
> lablgtk b
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires
> lablgtk but in fact it FTBFS when the package
> liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev is not installed, so I am tempted to believe
> the bug is still present in the new upstr
tags 549463 help
thanks
I'm packaging the new upstream version monotone-viz 1.0.2 from
http://oandrieu.nerim.net/monotone-viz/monotone-viz-1.0.2-nolablgtk.tar.gz
The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires
lablgtk but in fact it FTBFS when the package
liblablgtk2-gnome-ocam
Package: monotone-viz
Severity: important
Version: 1.0.1-1
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 11:18:15PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> If monotone-viz doesn't use any more
> binding that is not provided by lablgtk2, it should build pure bytecode
> executables (without -custom) on bytecode architectures.
F
5 matches
Mail list logo