Bug#549463: monotone-viz should not be linked with -custom, violates OCaml packaging policy

2010-03-29 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires >> lablgtk but in fact it FTBFS when the package >> liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev is not installed, so I am tempted to >> believe the bug

Bug#549463: [Monotone-debian] Bug#549463: monotone-viz should not be linked with -custom, violates OCaml packaging policy

2010-03-28 Thread Thomas Keller
Am 27.03.10 14:40, schrieb Ludovic Brenta: > tags 549463 help > thanks > > I'm packaging the new upstream version monotone-viz 1.0.2 from > http://oandrieu.nerim.net/monotone-viz/monotone-viz-1.0.2-nolablgtk.tar.gz > > The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires > lablgtk b

Bug#549463: monotone-viz should not be linked with -custom, violates OCaml packaging policy

2010-03-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:40:34PM +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires > lablgtk but in fact it FTBFS when the package > liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev is not installed, so I am tempted to believe > the bug is still present in the new upstr

Bug#549463: monotone-viz should not be linked with -custom, violates OCaml packaging policy

2010-03-27 Thread Ludovic Brenta
tags 549463 help thanks I'm packaging the new upstream version monotone-viz 1.0.2 from http://oandrieu.nerim.net/monotone-viz/monotone-viz-1.0.2-nolablgtk.tar.gz The name of the file suggests that monotone-viz no longer requires lablgtk but in fact it FTBFS when the package liblablgtk2-gnome-ocam

Bug#549463: monotone-viz should not be linked with -custom, violates OCaml packaging policy

2009-10-03 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Package: monotone-viz Severity: important Version: 1.0.1-1 On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 11:18:15PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > If monotone-viz doesn't use any more > binding that is not provided by lablgtk2, it should build pure bytecode > executables (without -custom) on bytecode architectures. F