Dear Aurelien, dear all,
for unrelated reasons I had to reinstall my system and now everything
works fine with the latest libc6.
I suppose there was some sort of horrible conflict somewhere.
Hopefully it won't be reproducible anywhere else.
As far as I'm concerned, case closed.
--
To UNSUBS
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:27:22PM +0100, Fabio Rosciano wrote:
> Dear Aurelien, dear all,
>
> I was trying once more the upgrade to libc6-2.10.2-2 and I have noticed
> that when dpkg configures libc6, it spits out a message like:
>
> dpkg: considering deconfiguration of libc6, which would be bro
Dear Aurelien, dear all,
I was trying once more the upgrade to libc6-2.10.2-2 and I have noticed
that when dpkg configures libc6, it spits out a message like:
dpkg: considering deconfiguration of libc6, which would be broken by
installation of libc-bin ...
dpkg: yes, will deconfigure libc6 (brok
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 19:28 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Are you using libpam-mount?
Hello Aurelien,
thanks for keeping up with this.
I have upgraded my desktop system to 2.10.1-5 and everything works fine,
while the laptop still gives the same problem when upgrading to this
version.
I also tho
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:41:35AM +0100, Fabio Rosciano wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> this morning my system blew up in my face as well after I tried a
> dist-upgrade.
> As Glynn reports, booting in multiuser is impossible, while single mode
> stops for a fsck which segfaults.
Are you using libpa
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 07:39:00AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> tag 551158 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:59:12AM +1000, Glynn wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.7-18
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
> >
> > The system will not boo
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:21:24AM +0100, Fabio Rosciano wrote:
> thanks for helping out.
> Here it is, I can't see anything funny:
[...]
Yes, the logs are pretty much the same as when I did the upgrade, except
I did not have libc6-dev-i386 installed and I went to 2.10.1-1 from
2.9-27.
Gab
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:41 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Do you have /var/log/dpkg.log? Even if it does not contain the action
> that failed first, the lines before the failure may show if packages
> were being installed in an unexpected order.
Hi Gabor,
thanks for helping out.
Here it is, I can
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:02:22AM +0100, Fabio Rosciano wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 08:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > Do you have the list of packages that have been upgraded?
>
> I wish I did, but as soon as debconf asked "would you like to upgrade
> libc6 now?" and I answered "yes",
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Fabio Rosciano a écrit :
>> Ok, I took a shortcut.
>> I booted a livecd and I mounted the / partition of the laptop.
>> Then I downloaded the following files:
>>
>> libc6_2.9-27_amd64.deb
>> libc6-dev_2.9-27_amd64.deb
>> libc6-i386_2.9-27_amd64.deb
>>
>> and unpacked them
Fabio Rosciano a écrit :
> Ok, I took a shortcut.
> I booted a livecd and I mounted the / partition of the laptop.
> Then I downloaded the following files:
>
> libc6_2.9-27_amd64.deb
> libc6-dev_2.9-27_amd64.deb
> libc6-i386_2.9-27_amd64.deb
>
> and unpacked them in the newly mounted directory:
>
Ok, I took a shortcut.
I booted a livecd and I mounted the / partition of the laptop.
Then I downloaded the following files:
libc6_2.9-27_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.9-27_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.9-27_amd64.deb
and unpacked them in the newly mounted directory:
$ dpkg-deb -X /tmp/where/the/root/is/mounte
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 08:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Do you have the list of packages that have been upgraded?
I wish I did, but as soon as debconf asked "would you like to upgrade
libc6 now?" and I answered "yes", the system became completely unusable.
However, my desktop has not been upg
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:41:35AM +0100, Fabio Rosciano wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> this morning my system blew up in my face as well after I tried a
> dist-upgrade.
Do you have the list of packages that have been upgraded?
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel
tag 551158 + unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:59:12AM +1000, Glynn wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.7-18
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> The system will not boot into multi user mode.
> It will boot to single user and then to root. It crashes o
15 matches
Mail list logo
