On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:09:17PM +0200, Robert Luberda wrote:
Raphael Hertzog writes:
Otherwise I discussed your patch with Guillem quickly the other day and he
would like to store the seen/not-seen information in a common place (i.e.
shared by all frontends). I'm not sure there's
Raphael Hertzog writes:
How can the two patches work together? I mean either the package has been
already seen or it's not.
The second patch complements to the first one, i.e. the latter depends
on and extends the former one.
Currently dselect treats all unknown packages as unseen, which is
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Robert Luberda wrote:
I discovered that the previous version of my patch re-added the purge
ok not-installed packages into status file. Fortunately the issue
turned out to be quite simple to fix. I'm attaching a new patch split
into two files.
The first one,
Hi,
I discovered that the previous version of my patch re-added the purge
ok not-installed packages into status file. Fortunately the issue
turned out to be quite simple to fix. I'm attaching a new patch split
into two files.
The first one, 1_dselect_559519+556889.patch.gz, causes dselect to
4 matches
Mail list logo
