On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:35:15 +0100 David Paleino wrote:
> On Sunday 27 December 2009 23:27:33, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > how should we handle this? should I release a new dlocate without
> > completion first, or will you divert the completion file to your
> > package?
>
> It would be best if you r
On Sunday 27 December 2009 23:27:33, Craig Sanders wrote:
> how should we handle this? should I release a new dlocate without
> completion first, or will you divert the completion file to your
> package?
It would be best if you released a dlocate without completion, and next I
release a package C
reassign 551707 bash-completion
thanks
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 at 22:49:31 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> dlocate maintainers: you could also consider letting us (bash-completion)
> handle the completion upstream; this way we would keep it up-to-date with our
> API (see note about _get_pword in >1.
3 matches
Mail list logo