Guido Günther wrote:
>
>> Point of this br is: Would you mind to change the Description
>> field in debian/control accordingly?
> Care to propose a patch?
> -- Guido
>
I don't know what to write there. If I had known, I wouldn't
have created this bug report.
AFAICS kvm 88 is in kernel 2.6.31.5
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:45:29AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Guido Günther wrote:
> > KVM is the "unstable" tree so yes, if you're running kvm you probably
> > want the modules shipped with the package. If you're running qemu-kvm
> > you're fine with what's in the kernel.
> > Cheers,
> > -- Gu
Guido Günther wrote:
> KVM is the "unstable" tree so yes, if you're running kvm you probably
> want the modules shipped with the package. If you're running qemu-kvm
> you're fine with what's in the kernel.
> Cheers,
> -- Guido
>
AFAICS there is no qemu-kvm in Debian. And Qemu doesn't make use
of
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:58:07AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Package: kvm-source
> Version: 88+dfsg-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Since kvm is already in the kernel source tree, it would
> be very nice to find some information about this in the
> Description field of the kvm-source package. Would
Package: kvm-source
Version: 88+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
Since kvm is already in the kernel source tree, it would
be very nice to find some information about this in the
Description field of the kvm-source package. Would you
recommend to install and build kvm-source, if I am running
Debian's kern
5 matches
Mail list logo