Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-11-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
Guido Günther wrote: > >> Point of this br is: Would you mind to change the Description >> field in debian/control accordingly? > Care to propose a patch? > -- Guido > I don't know what to write there. If I had known, I wouldn't have created this bug report. AFAICS kvm 88 is in kernel 2.6.31.5

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-11-02 Thread Guido Günther
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:45:29AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Guido Günther wrote: > > KVM is the "unstable" tree so yes, if you're running kvm you probably > > want the modules shipped with the package. If you're running qemu-kvm > > you're fine with what's in the kernel. > > Cheers, > > -- Gu

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-11-02 Thread Harald Dunkel
Guido Günther wrote: > KVM is the "unstable" tree so yes, if you're running kvm you probably > want the modules shipped with the package. If you're running qemu-kvm > you're fine with what's in the kernel. > Cheers, > -- Guido > AFAICS there is no qemu-kvm in Debian. And Qemu doesn't make use of

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-10-30 Thread Guido Günther
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:58:07AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Package: kvm-source > Version: 88+dfsg-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Since kvm is already in the kernel source tree, it would > be very nice to find some information about this in the > Description field of the kvm-source package. Would

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-10-30 Thread Harald Dunkel
Package: kvm-source Version: 88+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Since kvm is already in the kernel source tree, it would be very nice to find some information about this in the Description field of the kvm-source package. Would you recommend to install and build kvm-source, if I am running Debian's kern