On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:50:40PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:44:02AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:37:03AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > But at:
> > > > http://www.eglibc.org/archives/patches/msg00793.html
> > > >
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:44:02AM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:37:03AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > But at:
> > > http://www.eglibc.org/archives/patches/msg00793.html
> > >
> > > I was told to wait for upstream GNU glibc support, for a routine merge.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:37:03AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
> > But at:
> > http://www.eglibc.org/archives/patches/msg00793.html
> >
> > I was told to wait for upstream GNU glibc support, for a routine merge.
>
> That's actually the reverse. You should submit the patch to upstream GNU
>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:11:33AM +, Guido Trotter wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.10.1-7
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice if we could ship a glibc with KSM support, which is
> very useful for people running virtualization environments. I proposed a
>
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.10.1-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
It would be nice if we could ship a glibc with KSM support, which is
very useful for people running virtualization environments. I proposed a
patch at:
http://www.eglibc.org/archives/patches/msg00784.html
But at:
http://www.
5 matches
Mail list logo