block 557672 with 568314
thanks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:19:01AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Daniel Kobras wrote:
Are you aware of any relevant features still missing?
not that i'm aware of.
I've just filed a removal request for traceroute-nanog, which will
eventually resolve this bug.
Daniel Kobras wrote:
what's the status of the nanog emulation in traceroute proper these days?
being not familiar with -nanog, havent used it, i can't tell much.
Are you aware of any relevant features still missing?
not that i'm aware of.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse
Hi!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:50:36PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
the following mail needs your attention and I think Daniel
missed to CC you on it.
Nope. I've sent a copy via X-Debbugs-Cc to tracero...@p.d.o. I haven't heard
back from the traceroute maintainers, though, so thanks for
Hi Daniel,
the following mail needs your attention and I think Daniel
missed to CC you on it.
Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
FHS specifies that /bin, /usr/bin, and /usr/local/bin contains
programs
for use by all users. In particular,
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
FHS specifies that /bin, /usr/bin, and /usr/local/bin contains programs
for use by all users. In particular, root-only programs are placed in
/sbin, /usr/sbin, and /usr/local/sbin, instead.
As traceroute-nanog works only
Package: traceroute-nanog
Version: 6.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: squeeze RC policy ยง5.c
FHS specifies that /bin, /usr/bin, and /usr/local/bin contains programs
for use by all users. In particular, root-only programs are placed in
/sbin, /usr/sbin, and /usr/local/sbin, instead.
As
6 matches
Mail list logo
