Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-12-02 Thread Hakan Ardo
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Elrond elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote: Hi Hakan, Thanks for your quick investigations! * Can I tag the bug confirmed? Yes, I can reproduce it. * Do you need any further input from me to continue with  this issue? Probably not, but if so I'll

Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-12-02 Thread Elrond
package binutils-avr tags 558335 + confirmed thanks On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:38:25AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote: [...] * Do you need any further input from me to continue with  this issue? Probably not, but if so I'll let you know :) Good. Thanks for your work! Elrond -- To

Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-12-01 Thread Elrond
Hi Hakan, Thanks for your quick investigations! * Can I tag the bug confirmed? * Do you need any further input from me to continue with this issue? Greetings Elrond On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote: Hi, it seams to be the patch adding support for xmega devices

Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-11-29 Thread Hakan Ardo
Hi, thanx for the report. I'll look into it... On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Elrond elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote: Package: binutils-avr Version: 2.20-2 Here's the problem in very short:  avr% avr-objdump -d bug-lpm.o   try_asm:    0:   25 91           lpm    

Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-11-29 Thread Hakan Ardo
Hi, it seams to be the patch adding support for xmega devices that intoruces this bug. On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Hakan Ardo ha...@ardoe.net wrote: Hi, thanx for the report. I'll look into it... On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Elrond elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote:

Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-11-27 Thread Elrond
Package: binutils-avr Version: 2.20-2 Here's the problem in very short: avr% avr-objdump -d bug-lpm.o try_asm: 0: 25 91 lpm r18, Z+ 2: 24 91 lpm r18, Z+ 4: 08 95 ret The longer description can be found at [1]. Which brings