Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-12-08 Thread Rafael Ruiz
So, Nowdays there are a Linux distribution for Alpha working? Is NetBSD and OpenBSD our only choice? Linux kernel is good for Alpha, specially 2.4. Best, Rafa 2009/12/7 Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:28:49AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-12-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Rafael Ruiz gand...@gmail.com wrote: So, Nowdays there are a Linux distribution for Alpha working? Is NetBSD and OpenBSD our only choice? Gentoo is the only actively maintained distribution. Linux kernel is good for Alpha, specially 2.4. You should try 2.6.

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-12-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:28:49AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:39:53PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor The Ports section of [1] lists half a dozen porters for the Alpha architecture. Sadly, this is incorrect, as there is (afaik)

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-12-01 Thread Holger Levsen
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: the Alpha port has actually already been dropped: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg0.html thats exactly why I wrote what I wrote signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-12-01 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:13:05AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: the Alpha port has actually already been dropped: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg0.html thats exactly why I wrote what I wrote That is what I

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-11-30 Thread Karl Goetz
Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor The Ports section of [1] lists half a dozen porters for the Alpha architecture. Sadly, this is incorrect, as there is (afaik) no active Alpha porters in Debian. thanks, kk [1] http://www.debian.org/intro/organization#distribution -- System Information:

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-11-30 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:39:53PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor The Ports section of [1] lists half a dozen porters for the Alpha architecture. Sadly, this is incorrect, as there is (afaik) no active Alpha porters in Debian. thanks, kk [1]

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-11-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 30. November 2009, Osamu Aoki wrote: Should we remove Alpha section from this list? Someone who knows this for sure, please respond. I would rather suggest to keep the section and mention (there) that there are no alpha porters and thus the port is becoming unmaintained and is

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

2009-11-30 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:19:30PM +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit : Hi, On Montag, 30. November 2009, Osamu Aoki wrote: Should we remove Alpha section from this list? Someone who knows this for sure, please respond. I would rather suggest to keep the section and mention (there) that