Bug#560893: digikam broken in unstable?

2009-12-18 Thread Dietz Pröpper
Mark, You: > Please run strace on digikam. > > $ strace digikam > > and that will let us know what is going on. ;-) shall I attach 13M of strace output? > In my case I had an issue with FD 7 not being opened which led me to > nepomuk. Here, digikam seems to read from fd 7 infinitely. Attache

Bug#560893: digikam broken in unstable?

2009-12-18 Thread Mark Purcell
On Friday 18 December 2009 23:59:29 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > it is switched off but I noticed a running nepomukserver (but not the other > nepomuk processes). Killing that process and running digikam afterwards did > not change anything :-\. Dietz, Please run strace on digikam. $ strace digikam

Bug#560893: digikam broken in unstable?

2009-12-18 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thursday 17 December 2009 07:02:45 Dietz Pröpper wrote: > Digikam eats up 95%+ of the cpu and does not terminate properly. > (bug ##560893) Upstreams says, this might be a Debian problem. > > Therefore, can anyone confirm the behaviour? Yes I can confirm: http://bugs.debian.org/560893 and I