Hi Tim
After our discussion in September re packaging Hudson I ran a session at
the Ubuntu Developer Summit (see [0]) at the end of October to discuss
packaging of Hudson for Ubuntu. The session generated a-lot of interest
from development teams both within and outside of Ubuntu. Its already
On 10 November 2010 16:24, James Page james.p...@canonical.com wrote:
I want to make sure that the work that we are doing in Ubuntu can be fed
back into Debian; It would be good if we could collaborate appropriately
to ensure that this happens.
Thanks; I would welcome this collaboration. As
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 22:20 +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
On 10 September 2010 13:00, James Page james.p...@canonical.com wrote:
Has there been any further progress on working towards packaging Hudson
for Debian?
Hi James,
Hi Tim
I last looked at hudson at DebConf, and got hung up on some
On 22 September 2010 09:03, James Page james.p...@canonical.com wrote:
If the build from source objective is not achievable, what are the
options for Debian in terms of binary packaging?
Well, for binary packages, there's the non-free archive, which isn't
really considered part of Debian. DFSG
On 10 September 2010 13:00, James Page james.p...@canonical.com wrote:
Has there been any further progress on working towards packaging Hudson
for Debian?
Hi James,
I last looked at hudson at DebConf, and got hung up on some licensing
issues for the build dependencies.
I'd welcome any
Hi Tim
Has there been any further progress on working towards packaging Hudson
for Debian?
I've been looking into this as part of my work with the Ubuntu Server
Team and have some thoughts on packaging approach which I would like to
discuss/contribute.
I've also reviewed the dependency list
6 matches
Mail list logo
