On 01/03/11 at 09:42 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On 02/19/11 19:06, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
However, it is not recommended to keep ITP for a long time without acting on
the package, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from
packaging that software.
Actually, what
On 03/01/11 10:04, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
There is NO point encouraging someone else to waste more effort on this,
when no Debian developer is interested.
Did you look for a sponsor on debian-mentors@?
Nope. And looking at the feedback that the bug received (zero), maybe
it's pointless.
On 01/03/11 at 12:04 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On 03/01/11 10:04, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
There is NO point encouraging someone else to waste more effort on this,
when no Debian developer is interested.
Did you look for a sponsor on debian-mentors@?
Nope. And looking at the feedback
On 03/01/11 12:23, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
How do you expect DDs to learn that you did the packaging work if you
did not follow the procedure to find a sponsor?
I don't. It's an entirely unreasonable expectation. Hence my apology
for the knee-jerk reaction.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
--
To
On 02/19/11 19:06, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
However, it is not recommended to keep ITP for a long time without acting on
the package, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from
packaging that software.
Actually, what causes prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging
retitle 562157 RFP: e1000e -- Intel(R) PRO/1000 PCI-Express Gigabit Ethernet
driver
noowner 562157
thanks
Hi,
This is an automatic email to change the status of e1000e back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 6
6 matches
Mail list logo
