On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:54:01PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
is there any special reason for providing /etc/blends/science/science.conf
with the package and regenerating it via blend-update-usermenus through
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90science-config too?
Thanks for the comment. I was about to
Hi Andreas,
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Andreas Tille wrote:
But yould you please be more verbose why you
think that
blend-update-usermenus
is regenerating /etc/blends/science/science.conf ? This is not
the case but perhaps I might overlook something
I was just running sh -x
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
I was just running sh -x /usr/sbin/blend-update-usermenus science like the
apt hook and was guessing from that ... I didn't have closer look into the
script itself. Looking right now into it, it seems it is just reading the
file,
Hi there,
On Friday 25 December 2009, Holger wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But
this is not the real
Hi there,
On Friday 25 December 2009, you wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But
this is not the real
5 matches
Mail list logo
