On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:58:34PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
My understanding was that Jonas believes that software should be
deployed by the distro and not by developers (by using mechanisms such
as .xo bundles). From that POV sugar-platform is not needed.
I don't think it should be an either-
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:04:09PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
The problem is that because activity bundles (.xo) do not have the
ability to declare dependencies, activity developers must be able to
depend on a specific set package being available. I don't belive that
this list of packages ha
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:26:55PM -0600, dfarning wrote:
Is serious the correct category for this type of bug?
Nope. More info here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Read it.
Also, please simply skip version numbe
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:26:55PM -0600, dfarning wrote:
Is serious the correct category for this type of bug?
Nope. More info here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Also, please simply skip version number rather than providing a bogus
one like "lastest".
But thanks for try
4 matches
Mail list logo
